PaTAS: A parallel ‘trust meter’ for safer, more reliable AI predictions
Accuracy isn’t the same as reliability. Meet PaTAS—a “trust meter” that runs in parallel with neural networks to quantify how much you should trust each prediction, using Subjective Logic.
- How it works: PaTAS adds Trust Nodes and Trust Functions that propagate trust about inputs, parameters, and activations. A Parameter Trust Update learns which weights are reliable, while an Inference‑Path Trust Assessment (IPTA) estimates per‑example trust at inference.
- Why it matters: Produces interpretable, symmetric, and convergent trust scores; exposes reliability gaps in poisoned, biased, noisy, or adversarial data; and flags when model confidence diverges from actual reliability.
- What they found: Across real‑world and adversarial tests, PaTAS distinguishes benign from adversarial inputs and complements accuracy with clear uncertainty signals.
Bottom line: PaTAS makes trust a first‑class signal throughout the AI lifecycle—from training to deployment—so decisions in safety‑critical settings can be audited, compared, and improved.
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.20586v1
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.20586v1
Register: https://www.AiFeta.com
AI TrustworthyAI Reliability NeuralNetworks Safety AdversarialML Uncertainty Explainability SubjectiveLogic MLOps