Robots That Know When They’re Unsure

Kari Jaaskelainen

21 Nov 2025 — 1 min read

What if robots could reflect on their own decisions—like asking, "How sure am I?"

A new study proposes a metacognition architecture that lets robots estimate confidence in their choices and use it to guide action. Inspired by neuroscience, the system monitors embodied actions in real time and adjusts behavior—slowing down, seeking alternatives, or allocating more resources when confidence is low.

The team demonstrates this on autonomous tool invention: when facing a task that needs a tool, the robot evaluates how reliable its plan is and adapts, leading to more robust behavior in messy, real-world settings.

Why it matters: Confidence-aware robots can avoid brittle decisions and recover better from uncertainty.
What’s new: Treating confidence as a second-order judgment layered on top of ordinary decision making.
Where next: Safer deployment, adaptive industrial automation, assistive robots, and on-the-fly learning.

Paper: "Robot Metacognition: Decision Making with Confidence for Tool Invention" — arxiv.org/abs/2511.16390v1

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16390v1

Register: https://www.AiFeta.com

#Robotics #AI #Metacognition #EmbodiedAI #AutonomousRobots #ToolInvention #AIResearch #ArXiv

Meet GRACE: a moral governor for safer, more transparent AI

AI agents are getting powerful—so how do we make sure they do the right thing, not just the effective thing? Meet GRACE, a reason-based moral governor that keeps AI behavior aligned with human norms by separating moral reasoning from goal-driven decision-making. * Moral Module: uses deontic logic and explicit reasons

Why some fine-tuned LLMs miss phishing—and how to fix it

Not all fine-tuned LLMs spot phishing equally. A new study tests Llama 3.1 8B, Gemma 2 9B, and Mistral on high-stakes phishing detection—and uses SHAP and mechanistic interpretability to reveal why models do (or don’t) generalize. * Architecture × data diversity matters: Gemma 2 9B hits state-of-the-art performance (F1

AI that explains itself—by following the science

AI that explains itself—by following the science Black-box AI can be powerful, but it often can’t tell us why it made a decision. Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) try to fix that by predicting human-understandable concepts first, then the final answer. The catch: standard CBMs ignore domain-specific cause-and-effect and

Meet GenomAgent: A Team of AI Specialists for Smarter Genomics Q&A

TL;DR: Finding reliable answers in genomics is hard. GenomAgent turns one big AI into a coordinating team of specialists—and beats the current leader by 12% on a key benchmark. Genomic facts live across many databases. Standard chatbots struggle because they can’t flexibly query those sources. GeneGPT added

Read more

Meet GRACE: a moral governor for safer, more transparent AI

Why some fine-tuned LLMs miss phishing—and how to fix it

AI that explains itself—by following the science

Meet GenomAgent: A Team of AI Specialists for Smarter Genomics Q&A