Teaching AI What We Like—Faster and Smarter

Teaching AI What We Like—Faster and Smarter

Getting AI to reflect human preferences usually means showing it lots of examples—which is slow and costly. This paper proposes a smarter path: combine the scale of RLHF (used to tune large language models) with the efficiency of Bayesian preference optimization (PBO), which actively chooses the most informative questions to ask.

  • What’s new: An acquisition-driven module slots into the RLHF pipeline, so the system asks better “Which do you prefer?” questions instead of random ones.
  • Why it matters: Fewer labels, faster learning, and better alignment with human judgments.
  • Tested on: (i) complex preference optimization tasks and (ii) fine-tuning large language models.
  • Results: Consistent gains in sample efficiency and overall performance across both settings.

Think of it like training a chef: instead of making you taste every dish, they quickly learn by asking the few questions that reveal your tastes fastest.

Paper: Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback via Bayesian Preference Inference (Cercola, Capretti, Formentin). Read more: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04286v1

Paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04286v1

Register: https://www.AiFeta.com

AI MachineLearning ReinforcementLearning RLHF ActiveLearning Bayesian LLM HumanFeedback Research SampleEfficiency

Read more