What Really Drives AI Risk: Intelligence, Not Consciousness

Kari Jaaskelainen

25 Nov 2025 — 1 min read

Are conscious AIs more dangerous? Not necessarily. A new paper by Rufin VanRullen separates two often-blurred ideas—consciousness and intelligence—and shows why mixing them can misdirect AI safety debates.

Key takeaways

Consciousness ≠ intelligence. They are empirically and theoretically distinct.
It’s intelligence—the capability to achieve goals—that best predicts existential risk from AI.
Consciousness isn’t a direct risk factor, but it could matter indirectly: it might aid alignment (lowering risk) or be a prerequisite for certain high-level capabilities (raising risk).

Bottom line: focus research and policy on managing capabilities and objectives, while staying open to how consciousness could incidentally help or hinder safety.

Read the paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19115v1

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19115v1

Register: https://www.AiFeta.com

#AI #AISafety #ExistentialRisk #Consciousness #Intelligence #Alignment #Policy #arXiv

Read more

Meet GRACE: a moral governor for safer, more transparent AI

Meet GRACE: a moral governor for safer, more transparent AI

AI agents are getting powerful—so how do we make sure they do the right thing, not just the effective thing? Meet GRACE, a reason-based moral governor that keeps AI behavior aligned with human norms by separating moral reasoning from goal-driven decision-making. * Moral Module: uses deontic logic and explicit reasons

Why some fine-tuned LLMs miss phishing—and how to fix it

Why some fine-tuned LLMs miss phishing—and how to fix it

Not all fine-tuned LLMs spot phishing equally. A new study tests Llama 3.1 8B, Gemma 2 9B, and Mistral on high-stakes phishing detection—and uses SHAP and mechanistic interpretability to reveal why models do (or don’t) generalize. * Architecture × data diversity matters: Gemma 2 9B hits state-of-the-art performance (F1

AI that explains itself—by following the science

AI that explains itself—by following the science

AI that explains itself—by following the science Black-box AI can be powerful, but it often can’t tell us why it made a decision. Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) try to fix that by predicting human-understandable concepts first, then the final answer. The catch: standard CBMs ignore domain-specific cause-and-effect and

Meet GenomAgent: A Team of AI Specialists for Smarter Genomics Q&A

Meet GenomAgent: A Team of AI Specialists for Smarter Genomics Q&A

TL;DR: Finding reliable answers in genomics is hard. GenomAgent turns one big AI into a coordinating team of specialists—and beats the current leader by 12% on a key benchmark. Genomic facts live across many databases. Standard chatbots struggle because they can’t flexibly query those sources. GeneGPT added